Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 6.1: THE LAPLACE TRANSFORM KIAM HEONG KWA A tool of frequent occurrence in modern mathematics on studying an unknown function f is to transform the function f into another function by means of a linear integral transformation T : (1) f ( t ) 7 T f ( s ) = T [ f ( t )]( s ) = Z b a K ( s,t ) f ( t ) dt. Equation (1) gives the value at the point s of the transformed function T f , called the transform of f , in terms of the values of f at points in the interval ( a,b ). Either a or b or both may be infinite. The function K of two variables is referred to as the kernel of the transformation T . Such a linear transformation T satisfies the linearity property (2) T ( f + g ) = T f + T g for all functions f and g under consideration and for all scalars and . The transformation T will be particularly useful if, from the knowl- edge of T f , we are able to determine f uniquely. The process of recov- ering the unknown function f from its transform T f is known as the inversion problem . In this case, it is customary to denote the inverse transformation by T- 1 , so that T- 1 ( T f ) = f. The usefulness of an integral transformation arises from the fact that manipulating the transformed functions is often equivalent to handling the unknown functions under consideration and may be simpler. In this way, an entire problem may be converted to a simpler one and solved and then the original problem is solved by inverting the transformation. We shall consider a particular type of linear integral transformation, called the one-sided Laplace transform : (3) f ( t ) 7 L f ( s ) = L [ f ( t )]( s ) = Z e- st f ( t ) dt = lim Z e- st f ( t ) dt. Date : February 21, 2011. 1 2 KIAM HEONG KWA The Laplace transform can also be defined for complex-valued func- tions with the parameter s being complex also[1, 2]. As indicated in the following example, not every function possesses a Laplace transform. Example 1. The Laplace transform L [ e t 2 ]( s ) is not well-defined for any s . This is so since for every s , if t * > max { 1- | s | , 1 + | s |} , then Z t * e- st e t 2 dt = Z t * e t ( t- s ) dt Z t * e t dt = e - e t * for all t * , from which it follows that Z t * e- st e t 2 dt lim ( e - e t * ) = . This implies that the improper integral defining L [ e t 2 ]( s ) also diverges. In order to show that there is a large class of functions that admits Laplace transforms, we first make a few definitions in the following. Definition 1. A function f is said to have a jump discontinuity at a point if both the one-sided limits f ( - ) = lim t - f ( t ) and f ( +) = lim t + f ( t ) exist as finite numbers and f ( - ) 6 = f ( +) ....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/11/2011 for the course MATH 255.01 taught by Professor Kwa during the Winter '11 term at Ohio State.

Page1 / 19


This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online