HW1 - equilibrium values for prices and allocations (c)...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Graduate Macro II, Homework 1 Jonathan Heathcote Due in class on Tuesday January 31st 2006 Recall the example economy we worked through following Chapter 2 in Dirk Krueger’s notes. 1. Consider the following alternative description of preferences and endow- ments. Period utility is given by u ( c i )= ¡ c i ¢ 1 γ 1 γ Assume both individuals are in f nitely-lived, and discount at rate β . Sup- pose the endowment stream is e 1 t =1 . 5 if t is even, e 1 t =1 if t is odd e 2 t =0 . 5 if t is even, e 2 t =2 if t is odd (a) Characterize the set of Pareto E cient allocations in this economy, assuming β =0 . 9 and γ =2 . (b) For these parameter values, use Negishi’s method to f nd a candidate competitive equilibrium for this economy. Describe the candidate equilibrium values for prices and allocations (c) Verify that the prices and allocations you solved for satisfy the nec-
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: equilibrium values for prices and allocations (c) Verify that the prices and allocations you solved for satisfy the nec-essary conditions for equilibrium (d) Which agent enjoys higher utility in the equilibrium, and why? 2. Now revert back to the original description of preferences and endowments. Consider a Pareto e ffi cient allocation indexed by the Pareto weight α. Show that for any α ∈ (0 , 1) this e ffi cient allocation can be decentralized as a competitive sequential markets equilibrium given an appropriate choice for a 1 (where a 1 is not necessarily equal to zero). 1...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/10/2011 for the course ECON 601 at Cornell.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online