Accidental vs - Categories . For substantial change...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Accidental vs. Substantial Change Aristotle notes (190b11) an important feature of change: that which comes to be is always composite . For example, what comes to be is the musical man . But what about Aristotle’s other case? What is the statue a compound of? Aristotle’s answer: matter and form . We thus see two different kinds of change in Aristotle’s account: a. Accidental change (e.g., alteration of a substance): the subject is a substance . E.g., the man becomes a musician, Socrates becomes pale. b. Substantial change (generation and destruction of a substance): the subject is matter , the form is the form of a substance. E.g., the bronze becomes a statue, a seed becomes a tiger, an acorn becomes an oak tree. Accidental change can be accommodated within the world of the Categories , a world in which primary substances (individual horses, trees, etc.) are the basic individuals. But what of substantial change? This seems to threaten the ontology of the
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Categories . For substantial change requires a subject (viz., matter) that seems more basic than the individual plants and animals of the Categories . But this creates a problem: if the primary substances of the Categories turn out to be compounds of form and matter, how can they be the basic ingredients of the world? Example: a builder is not a basic individual, for Aristotle. A builder is a compound of a subject and a property: a substance (a human being) and a characteristic (s)he happens to havethe knowledge of building. How, then, can a tiger retain its status as a basic individual? After all, it, too, is a compound of a subject and a property: matter and a form that supervenes, a form that the matter happens to have. This problem is not addressed in the Physics , but it is one that Aristotle returns to in the Metaphysics . His answer, as we shall see, is not altogether clear....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/14/2011 for the course PHI PHI2010 taught by Professor Jorgerigol during the Fall '09 term at Broward College.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online