The Race Course - one by one in a finite time ” Physics...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The Race Course: Part 2 1. Our look at the plurality argument suggests that Zeno may have thought that to run all the Z -runs would be to run a distance that is infinitely long . If this is what he thought, he was mistaken. The reason the sum of all the Z -intervals is not an infinitely large distance is that there is no smallest Z -interval. And Zeno does not establish that there is some smallest Z -run. (If there were a smallest Z -run, he wouldn’t have been able to show that R had to make infinitely many Z -runs.) 2. What about Aristotle’s understanding of Zeno? Here is what he says [RAGP 8 ]: Zeno’s argument makes a false assumption when it asserts that it is impossible to traverse an infinite number of positions or to make an infinite number of contacts
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: one by one in a finite time ” ( Physics 233a21-24). 3. Aristotle points out that there are two ways in which a quantity can be said to be infinite: in extension or in divisibility . The race course is infinite in divisibility. But, Aristotle goes on, “the time is also infinite in this respect.” Hence, there is a sense in which R has an infinite number of distances to cross. But in that sense he also has an infinite amount of time to do it in. (If a finite distance is infinitely divisible, then why isn’t a finite time also infinitely divisible?) 4. So Zeno cannot establish (2) for either of the first two reasons we considered: to make all the Z-runs, R does not have to run infinitely far. Nor does R have to keep running forever....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online