2 Stages of Processing

2 Stages of Processing - of a category, rather than an...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
2 Stages of Processing: 1. Process all features of subject with predicate; comparison of  characteristic features . if low similarity between features --> respond 'false' if high similarity between features --> respond 'true' if intermediate similarity, Stage 2 processing 2. Create comparison question; comparison of  defining features . A bat is a bird --> a bat is a mammal; is a bird a mammal? A chicken is a bird. -->  does not fly, does chicken have feathers? takes more time to respond Research FOR Feature Comparison Model: typicality effect : A carrot is a vegetable. A rutabaga is a vegetable. we make faster sentence verification decisions when an item is a typical member 
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: of a category, rather than an unusual member WHY? high similarity between features allows for Stage 1 processing only for 'A carrot is a vegetable'; Stage 1 and Stage 2 processing is necessary for 'A rutabaga is a vegetable' Research AGAINST Feature Comparison Model: category size effect : A poodle is a dog. A squirrel is an animal. we make faster sentence verification decisions when an item is a member of a small category small categories contain more defining features; therefore, FC model would predict that there should be more Stage 2 processing for small categories and thus longer RTs...
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

2 Stages of Processing - of a category, rather than an...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online