This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: towards them. Independently of this, we might wonder how successful Strawson’s approach is on its own terms. And the big worry here is whether or not we can isolate the theoretical from the practical in the way he suggests. One aspect of this is the following: don’t we think that there is a real question of whether we are right in thinking that we are justified in holding someone responsible? We don’t just want to say: ‘This is what we do’; we want to say ‘This is what we are justified in doing’. One way of thinking about this is to compare it with other practices. Thus suppose someone made a parallel defense of religion. Suppose it could be shown that there was a natural human tendency to believe in a god, and that human beings flourished when they did. Would that justify belief in god? Wouldn’t we want to say: whether or not it is unavoidable, or it benefits us, we want to know whether the belief is justified. We want to know whether there is a god....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 11/14/2011 for the course PSY PSY2012 taught by Professor Scheff during the Fall '09 term at Broward College.
- Fall '09