flexcon_rev2 (3)

flexcon_rev2 (3) - Insourcing/Outsourcing Case The FlexCon...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Insourcing/Outsourcing Case: The FlexCon Piston Decision 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This case addresses many issues that affect insourcing/outsourcing decisions. A complex and important topic facing businesses today is whether to produce a component, assembly, or service internally (insourcing), or whether to purchase that same component, assembly, or service from an external supplier (outsourcing). Because of the important relationship between insourcing/outsourcing and competitiveness, organizations must consider many variables when considering an insourcing/outsourcing decision. This may include a detailed examination of a firm’s competency and costs, along with quality, delivery, technology, responsiveness, and continuous improvement requirements. Because of the critical nature of many insourcing/outsourcing decisions, cross-functional teams often assume responsibility for managing the decision-making process. A single functional group usually does not have the data, insight, or knowledge required to effectively make strategic insourcing/outsourcing decisions. CASE OBJECTIVES At the conclusion of this case, participants should recognize the importance of: Linking insourcing/outsourcing decisions to strategic corporate requirements, including the need to define core competencies Recognizing the qualitative and quantitative considerations associated with insourcing/outsourcing decisions Performing a total cost analysis to support insourcing/outsourcing recommendations FLEX-CON'S INSOURCING/OUTSOURCING OF PISTONS FlexCon, a $3 billion maker of small industrial engines, is undergoing a major internal review to decide where the company should focus its future product development efforts and strategic investment. Executive management is arguing that too much capacity and talent are being committed to producing simple, commodity-type items that provide small differentiation within the marketplace. FlexCon concluded that in its attempts to preserve jobs, it has insourced parts that are easy to manufacture, while outsourcing those that are complex or challenging. Producing commodity-like components with mature technologies is adding little to what FlexCon's customers consider important. The company has become increasingly dependent on suppliers for critical components and subassemblies that make a major difference in the performance and cost of end products. Part of FlexCon's effort at redefining itself involves creating an understanding of insourcing/outsourcing among managers and employees. The company has sponsored workshops and presentations to convey executive management's vision and goals, plus educate those who are directly involved in making detailed insourcing/outsourcing recommendations. 2
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 16

flexcon_rev2 (3) - Insourcing/Outsourcing Case The FlexCon...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online