THE_FUNCTIONALIST_THEORY_OF_STRATIFICATION

THE_FUNCTIONALIST_THEORY_OF_STRATIFICATION - THE...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
THE FUNCTIONALIST THEORY OF STRATIFICATION The functionalist theory of social inequality holds that stratification exists because it is beneficial for society. All societies require a system of stratification if they are to fill all the statuses comprising the social structure and to motivate individuals to perform the duties associated with these positions. Consequently, society must motivate people at two different levels: (1) It must instill in certain individuals the desire to fill various positions, and (2) once the individuals are in these positions, it must instill in them the desire to carry out the appropriate roles. This theory was most clearly set forth in 1945 by Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore, although it has been subsequently modified and refined by other sociologists. Davis and Moore argued that social stratification is both universal and necessary, and hence no society is ever totally unstratified or classless. Society must concern itself with human motivation because the duties associated with the various statuses are not all equally pleasant to the human organism, are not all equally important to social survival, and are not all equally in need of the same abilities and talents. If social life were otherwise, it would make little difference who got into which positions, and the problem of social placement would be greatly reduced. Moreover, the duties associated with a good many positions are viewed by their occupants as onerous. Hence, in the absence of motivation, many individuals would fail to act out their roles. For example, imagine being a dentist. How likely is it that talented and intelligent people would train to become dentists – pulling teeth, working to correct extensive (and bad- smelling) decay, bending near to people’s faces even when they have runny noses, coughs, and bad breath, causing people pain, anxiety, and distress – if the pay and status were not fairly high? Maintaining the dental health of our population is important to society, and so we want to motivate people to become dentists. On the basis of these social realities, functionalists contend that a society must have (1) some kind of rewards that it can use as inducements for its members, and (2) some way of distributing these rewards among the various statuses. Inequality is the motivational incentive that society has evolved to meet the problems of filling all the statuses and getting the occupants to enact the associated roles to the best of their abilities. Since these rewards are built into the social system, social stratification is a structural feature of all societies. Employing the economists’ model of supply and demand, funtionalists say that the positions most highly rewarded are those (1) that are occupied by the most talented or qualified incumbents (supply) and (2) that are functionally most important (demand). For example, to ensure sufficient physicians, a society needs to offer them high salaries and great prestige. If it did not offer these rewards, functionalists suggest that we could not
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This document was uploaded on 11/16/2011.

Page1 / 4

THE_FUNCTIONALIST_THEORY_OF_STRATIFICATION - THE...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online