BDnotes27Oct

BDnotes27Oct - o Only a few pest houses, none created by...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Heading into the Plague Abyss Medicine and survival during the Great Plague of London Overview The Abyss Samuel Pepys: who did stay in London in 1665 o John Evelyn: who spent little time in London proper, but kept close watch of the news in his parish and area of the city Dealing with the Great Plague: medicine, policy, science, cures Medicine and public health: Public health approaches to plague control o Traditional: Plague Orders were copied unchanged from previous plagues Orders addressed the minutiae of plague control Came from the King’s “Privy Council” Tended to control plague as a contact-borne (or contagious) disease
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: o Only a few pest houses, none created by the government of England or of London Wholesale abandonment of poor by September: an aspect of the abyss Medical authorities: a marketplace o Elite College of Physicians practitioners: mostly traditional medicines o New scientific societies envisioned new experimentation, observation, but few new cures o Apothecaries: became by default the principle vendors of medicine to those who had to stay in London o Quacks: could from our perspectives come from any of these groups, or have no authority at all. Preyed upon scared, desperate people...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/18/2011 for the course HIST-H 213 taught by Professor Charmichael during the Fall '11 term at Indiana.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online