Lecture11

# Lecture11 - 12.11 Solution of PDEs by Laplace Transforms We...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 12.11 Solution of PDEs by Laplace Transforms We may transform a PDE involving both space and time into a family of PDEs involving spatial variables only. This is accomplished by the Laplace transform, which for a function f : (0 , ∞ ) → R is defined by f # ( s ) ≡ L [ f ]( s ) := ∞ integraldisplay f ( t ) e − st dt, s ∈ C . (391) if the integral exists (it does for a large class of functions, for Re( s ) large enough). L is a linear transform and has an inverse, L − 1 . Using integration by parts, we find that the Laplace transform of the n-th derivative of F is given by L [ f ( n ) ]( s ) = s L [ f ( n − 1) ]( s ) − f ( n − 1) (0) . (392) By induction we conclude that L [ f ( n ) ]( s ) = s n L [ f ]( s ) − s n − 1 f (0) − ··· − sf ( n − 2) (0) − f ( n − 1) (0) . (393) Remark: Because of property ( 393 ), the Laplace transform is particularly suited to initial value problems, which model physical systems that are at rest for all times t < 0 and suddenly change at t = 0. If, on the other hand, the system is time-invariant, it is better to use the Fourier transform instead. We may use ( 393 ) to eliminate the time derivatives in a PDE. Consider the following initial value problem for the wave equation: U tt = c 2 Δ U, in Ω × (0 , ∞ ) , c > , (394) U = 0 , U t = 0 , in Ω × { } . (395) This problem is not well posed, but we will take care of the boundary condi- tions later. The Laplace transform u ( x ; s ) := L [ U ( x , · )]( s ) of the unknown function U ( x ,t ) satisfies the Helmholtz equation Δ u + k 2 u = 0 , in Ω , k := is c ∈ C . (396) Any boundary condition imposed on U on ∂ Ω × (0 , ∞ ) also needs to be Laplace transformed, which yields a new boundary condition for u on ∂ Ω. Thus we end up with a boundary value problem in Ω. For simple shapes of Ω, we can solve this problem analytically, as we have seen for a rectangle in 2D (Section 12.8 squiggleright double Fourier series), a disk in 2D (Section 12.9 squiggleright Fourier-Bessel series), as well as in the case of a spherical boundary in 3D (Section 12.10 squiggleright spherical harmonics). 69 12.12 Application: hydrogen-like atomic orbitals A hydrogen-like atom is one with a single electron (charge − e , where e ≃ 1 . 60 · 10 − 19 C denotes the elementary charge) and a nucleus of charge Ze , with the atomic number Z ∈ N . The quantum state of the electron is described by the wave function Ψ : R 3 × (0 , ∞ ) → C : the function | Ψ | 2 is the probability density for the position of the electron at time t > 0. The time evolution of the wave function Ψ is described by the Schr¨odinger equation i planckover2pi1 ∂ Ψ ∂t = − planckover2pi1 2 2 m e ΔΨ + V Ψ , (397) where i 2 = − 1 and where planckover2pi1 ≃ 1 . 05 · 10 − 34 Js denotes the reduced Planck constant, m e ≃ 9 . 11 · 10 − 31...
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 11/17/2011 for the course MATH 529 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at UNC.

### Page1 / 7

Lecture11 - 12.11 Solution of PDEs by Laplace Transforms We...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online