42. - absolute presuppositions • Emotivism is...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
PHL100Y1 March 18, 2010 Lecture Is A. J. Heir an ‘ass-hat’? – is this verifable This is on the exam VCM (Verifable Criteria oF Meaning) Fails test oF selF reFerence Hume Ayer Kant Collingwood Propositions Relative presuppositions Absolute presuppositions POSSIBLE SOLUTION No. 1: pragmatism The VCM isn’t based on whether is it meaningFul but iF it is useFul POSSIBLE SOLUTION No. 2: critical or descriptive metaphysics (vs. pseudo-metaphysics AND positivism) Whose business it is not to clear up conFusions, but to help articulate relative and
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: absolute presuppositions • Emotivism is unconvincing as an athical position ±ACT VALUE CF. Hume: deriving an ‘ought’ From an ‘is’ “The naturalistic Fallacy” (Moore, Principia Ethica [1903]) Providing a claim about ethics by appealing to a defnition oF the term “good” in terms oF one oF more natural properties (such as “pleasant”, “more evolved,” “desired,” etc.) BUT: can we do ethics in this manner? POSSIBLE SOLUTION: rational reconstruction oF ethical meaning; developmental account • He is an ass-hat...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/18/2011 for the course PHL 100Y1 taught by Professor Professormarkkingwell during the Fall '09 term at University of Toronto.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online