This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: intentional tort of wrongful interference with a contractual relationship. To recover damages under this theory, Harley would need to show that he and Martha had a valid contract, that Lothar knew of this contractual relationship between Martha and Harley, and that Lothar intentionally convinced Martha to break her contract with Harley. Even though Lothar hoped that his advertisements would persuade Martha to break her contract with Harley, the question states that Marthas decision to change bakers was based solely on the advertising and not on anything else that Lothar did. Lothars advertisements did not constitute a tort. Note, though, that while Harley cannot collect from Lothar for Marthas actions, he does have a cause of action against Martha for her breach of their contract....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 11/21/2011 for the course MGMT 4324 taught by Professor Tim during the Spring '11 term at Andhra University.
- Spring '11
- Business Law