06reviewP1 - I NFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 0019-9567/00/$04.00 1...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: I NFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 0019-9567/00/$04.00 1 Dec. 2000, p. 65116518 Vol. 68, No. 12 Copyright 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. MINIREVIEW Host-Pathogen Interactions: Basic Concepts of Microbial Commensalism, Colonization, Infection, and Disease ARTURO CASADEVALL* AND LIISE-ANNE PIROFSKI Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, and Department of Microbiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461 Most of the terminology used to define the host-microbe interaction has been in use for nearly a century. Early in this period, microbes were thought to be primary aggressors that governed the host-pathogen interaction, resulting in dis- ease. Later, new information about the attributes of microbes and their hosts resulted in the understanding that the host- pathogen interaction does not always result in disease. This recognition, in turn, led to the introduction of terms to explain states in which microbes exist within hosts without causing overt disease and why some microbes only cause disease in certain hosts. Commensal, carrier state, and opportunist were terms put forth to account for microbes and conditions that were sometimes associated with disease but for which Kochs postulates could not be fulfilled for one reason or another. Most of these terms were originally proposed to describe the behavior of particular microbes, rather than to define a more general host-microbe relationship. Recently, we reviewed the concepts of virulence and patho- genicity and described how the definitions for these terms changed over the years as microbiologists tried to find ways to convey that microbial pathogenesis reflects an interaction be- tween two entities, host and pathogen (7). Based on the con- cept that host damage was the most relevant outcome of the host-pathogen interaction, we proposed revisions to the defi- nitions of the terms pathogen, pathogenicity, and virulence (7). However, the proposed framework suggested a need to reex- amine the terms used to define the outcomes of host-microbe interactions. Here, we critically review the origin and historical evolution of key concepts used to describe the outcome of host-microbe interactions, namely, infection, commensalism, colonization, persistence, infection, and disease. We propose that the meaning of these terms can be clarified by placing them in the context of the damage framework put forth pre- viously (7). LEXICON OF MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS Once the germ theory of disease was accepted, microbes were considered to be pathogens if they met the stipulations of Kochs postulate. However, it rapidly became apparent that (i) although there are many microbes, most human infections were caused by only a few; (ii) some microbes were classified as pathogens although they did not cause disease in every host; and (iii) some microbes were classified as nonpathogens, al- though they did cause disease in certain hosts (for an early review, see reference 56). In addition, it became evident thatreview, see reference 56)....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/21/2011 for the course ZOO 4232 taught by Professor Kima during the Fall '10 term at University of Florida.

Page1 / 8

06reviewP1 - I NFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 0019-9567/00/$04.00 1...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online