{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Case Brief 5,6,7 - Huan Long(201005051 Case Brief 5 Eckert...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Huan Long (201005051) Case Brief 5: Eckert v. Long Island R. Co. Facts: On the 26 th of November, 1867, a three- or four-year old child was sitting or standing upon a track of the defendants road as the train was approaching, was liable to be run over, if not removed. Henry Eckert, the plaintiff’s intestate, seeing the danger of the child, ran to it and saved him. However, when he tried to across the track himself, he was struck, thrown down, and received injuries and died the same night. Rules of Law: ALLEN and FOLGER, JJ., contra; Gould v. Oliver, 2 Scotts. N. R., 257; Ilott v. Wilkes, 3 B. & Ald., 311; Slagan v. Slingerland, 2 Caines, 219; Per MARVIN, J., in Corwin v. N. Y. and E. R. R. Co., 3 Ker., 42; per COWEN, J., in Hatfield v. Roper, 21 W. R., 620; Per BEARDSLEY, J., Tonawanda R. R. Co., v. Munger, 5 Denio, 255; Evansville R. R. Co. v. Hyatt (17 Ind., 102). Issues: 1. Is the action of plaintiff’s intestate negligent? 2. Should the deceased be liable for his injury? Holdings: 1. No. According to the ALLEN and FOLGER, JJ., contra, a person voluntarily placing himself, for the protection of property merely, in a position of danger, is negligent; however, when the exposure is for the purpose of saving life, it is not wrongful, and therefore not negligent unless such as to be regarded either rash or reckless. 2. Yes. Under the maxim volenti non fit injuria, no one can maintain an action for a wrong, when he consents or contributes to the act which occasions his loss. Rationale: 1. The deceased’s action was aimed to save the child’s life. Negligence implies some act of commission or omission wrongful in itself. Under the circumstances in which the deceased was placed, it was not wrongful in him to make every effort in his power to rescue the child, compatible with a reasonable regard for his own safety. It was his duty to exercise his judgment as to whether he could probably save the child without serious injury to himself. If, from the appearances, he believed that he could, it was not negligence to make an attempt so to do, although believing that possibly he might fail and receive an injury himself. All in all, the law has so high a regard for human
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern