Anthropogenic fire regime1

Anthropogenic fire regime1 - Purposes & effects...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Anthropogenic fire regimes If anthropogenic, then also viewed as “unnatural” As discussed above, ecologists have mostly given up the first postulate (that disturbance is harmful & disruptive), but they've had a harder time letting go of the "anthropogenic = unnatural” assumption European/colonial forestry & land use has long attempted to suppress fires (in order to maximize timber production, prevent property damage, etc.) Thus, indigenous burning regimes (which were nearly universal -- see Pyne 1998 for a review) were actively suppressed by colonial and post-colonial regimes worldwide Results of this policy include disappearance of open habitats (succession), and the build-up of fuel (unburned underbrush, etc.) which periodically resulted in catastrophic fires (caused by lightning or human accidents)
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Purposes & effects of anthropogenic burning: Create new clearings Swidden cultivation Improve productivity of favored plants Browse or graze for hunting & herding Growth of berries, tubers, etc. Remove underbrush or grass Expose animal tracks & burrows for hunting Improve ease of travel Reduce fire hazards near camps/villages Reduce pests or insects Other Create dry firewood Heat soil to lengthen growing season Create/maintain successional mosaic (Mardu example--see Bird et al. 2005) Many fire ecologists are now realizing not only that recurrent burning is a good thing for ecosystem resilience and biodiversity, but that historic anthropogenic burning regimes have shaped many ecosystems and should be brought back in some form or other (Pyne 1998)...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online