notes_2_2x2 - Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 1 ✬...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 1 ✬ ✫ ✩ ✪ Announcements and Such • Today’s Music: Janelle Monáe — The ArchAndroid • Last time we talked about administrative stuff. – If you need a syllabus, pick one up from us today. Then: study the website, and ask your me or your GSI any questions you have. • Sections will meet Monday & Friday (starting this Friday). – Bledin: 1–3:30 MF. Students AHN – LIN. Room: 213 Wheeler. – Lawrence: 1–3:30 MF. Students LIU – ZHANG. Room: 130 Wheeler. • HW #1 has been posted (it will be done as a “quiz” in section Friday). • I’ve also posted a handout on validity and soundness , and a handout on tips & guidelines for homeworks . You should download & study these. • HW #2 will be posted tomorrow (it will be due next Thursday). • Today: Intro. & Chapter 1, continued. Then, Chapter 2: Our first formal logical theory/framework — the L anguage of S entential L ogic ( LSL ). UCB Philosophy Introduction (Cont’d) & Chapter 2 05/26/10 Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 2 ✬ ✫ Informal (“Absolute”) Validity — Our Fundamental Concept • An argument is a collection of propositions , one of which (the conclusion ) is meant to follow-from the others (the premises ). • From a logical point of view, an argument A is “good” just in case its conclusion does follow-from its premises — that is, if A is valid . • Our (informal) definition of validity is as follows: Definition . A is valid iff it is ( logically !) impossible for both of the following to be true simultaneously ( i.e. , in the same situation): (1) All of A ’s premises are true. (2) A ’s conclusion is false. • A more operational way of understanding the definition is as follows. – Suppose that all of A ’s premises are true. Then, try to imagine a situation (or possible world) like that in which A ’s conclusion is false. If that is conceivable, then A is in valid (otherwise, A ’s valid). UCB Philosophy Introduction (Cont’d) & Chapter 2 05/26/10 Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 3 ✬ ✫ ✩ ✪ Validity, Soundness, and “ All-Things-Considered Good” Arguments • A “good” argument is one in which the conclusion follows from the premises. But, intuitively, there is more to a “good” argument (all things considered) than mere validity. [But, after chapter 1, we won’t care.] • Ideally, arguments should also have (actually) true premises . If the premises of an argument are (actually) false, then (intuitively) the argument isn’t very “good” (or actually useful) — even if it is valid. ☞ Definition . An argument A is sound if and only if both : ( i ) A is valid, and ( ii ) all of A ’s premises are (actually) true....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/26/2011 for the course PHILOSOPHY 101 taught by Professor Buechner during the Fall '06 term at Rutgers.

Page1 / 6

notes_2_2x2 - Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 1 ✬...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online