Section I

Section I - Section I Philosophy Knowledge and the Nature...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Section I. Philosophy, Knowledge, and the Nature of "Knowing" There are no right or wrong decisions in research, only more or less defensible ones. Introduction The purpose of this section is to describe some basic viewpoints concerning the process of inquiry into communication phenomena. It addresses the common scientific/positivistic approach as well as the interpretive and critical philosophies and methodologies -- the so called "alternative paradigms". These alternative approaches are re-emerging in communication with some vigor, and there have been continuing debates over the utility, validity and suitability of the so-called "mainstream" positivist/ objectivist/scientific paradigm vs. these alternative interpretivist and critical/cultural paradigms . My hope is that these notes, textbook readings and class discussion will give you a basic understanding of the various ways of studying communication. We will be addressing these paradigms for the entire semester. It is my contention that there is not, nor will there be, a definitive answer to the question, "Which of these paradigms is the best for the study of communication?" I think that the different approaches are more or less appropriate for different communication questions and settings. Moreover, the pace of change is ever-quickening in the world and in the communication discipline; in these circumstances a scholar should not grasp any paradigm too firmly. Indeed, the mark of scholarship is an understanding of the various paradigms and a willingness to admit the follies of each and the frailties of science in general. Science/Scientific method A tool used to explain and predict phenomena Rather than discovery, science creates, or invents, explanations for observed phenomena The explanations that scientists create are called "theories" Science is interested in developing theories about ordered, reoccurring, observable phenomena in nature The purpose of science is to create theories which explain and predict patterned and repetitious phenomena through objective and replicable observation Criteria for judging products of the scientific method There are three major criteria used in judging the products of the scientific method: Utility: If a product of the scientific method can explain and predict, and is replicable, it has utility Symmetry: If a product of the scientific method makes logical sense it has symmetry Parsimony: also called "efficiency." That theoretic explanation or model that explains the phenomena of interest with the fewest assumptions and simplest structure is the most valued. Explaining the most with the least. Occam's razor.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
** If a product of the scientific method has both symmetry and parsimony it has elegance, or logical efficiency . No Research is Value-Free: Researchers create their own values through their own experiences
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/27/2011 for the course COM 5312 taught by Professor Edwardwotring during the Fall '06 term at FSU.

Page1 / 9

Section I - Section I Philosophy Knowledge and the Nature...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online