This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: 1. Prove Proposition 3.1. Proposition 3.1 Let be a signed measure on . If is an increasing sequence in , then lim . If is a decreasing sequence in and is finite, then lim . Answer) Let be a signed measure on . a. If is an increasing sequence in , if we set , then the sets are disjoint, so lim lim lim b. If is a decreasing sequence in , and , then let . Then , , and By (a) we have lim lim lim Subtracting from both sides gives lim 2. If is a signed measure, is null iff . Also, if and are signed measure, iff iff and . Answer ) Let be a signed measure. If is null, and if is a Hahn decomposition of , then and ; hence, . Conversely, if , then . Thus if , then and , from which it follows that . As this is true for any measurable , is null. 3. Let be a signed measure on . a. . b. If , ....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 11/25/2011 for the course MATH 245c taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '08 term at UCLA.
 Fall '08
 staff

Click to edit the document details