This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: imports, save money, create jobs, and help with global warming. As we know, there are two sides to every argument. Opposing Friedman, is Charli E Coon. Hes from Why the Governments CAF standards for fuel efficiency should be repealed, Not increased.. He argues that CAF failed to meet its goals of reducing oil imports and gasoline consumption and has endangered human lives. He goes on to say that it needs to be abolished and replaced with market based solutions. (Easton, 2008) I will dive into both sides of the issue and use past and current data to support the thoughts on both each sides. The date will provide statistics and economic measures used to determine the pros and cons of vehicle efficiency. SHOULD CARS 3 Reference: Easton, T. (2008). Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial environmental issues. (Custom 13 th ed.).New York: McGraw-Hill....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 11/26/2011 for the course MGT 380 380 taught by Professor Lent during the Spring '10 term at Ashford University.
- Spring '10