Evans 2002 SMT Prev Theories

Evans 2002 SMT Prev Theories - R EVIEW OF THE L ITERATURE M...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: R EVIEW OF THE L ITERATURE M ECHANISMS AND E FFECTS OF S PINAL H IGH-V ELOCITY , L OW-A MPLITUDE T HRUST M ANIPULATION : P REVIOUS T HEORIES David W. Evans, BSc (Hons) Ost a A BSTRACT Objectives: When the clinical efficacy of spinal manipulative treatment for spinal pain has been assessed, high-velocity low-amplitude thrust (HVLAT) manipulation and mobilization have been regarded as clinical interventions giving identical and equivalent biologic effects. The objective of this review is to critically discuss previous theories and research of spinal HVLAT manipulation, highlighting reported neurophysiologic effects that seem to be uniquely associated with cavitation of synovial fluid. Data Source: The biomedical literature was searched for research and reviews on spinal manipulation. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were used to help find relevant articles. Study Selection: All articles relevant to the objectives were selected. Data Extraction: All available data were used. Data Synthesis: The main hypotheses for lesions that respond to HVLAT manipulation were critically discussed: (1) release of entrapped synovial folds or plica, (2) relaxation of hypertonic muscle by sudden stretching, (3) disruption of articular or periarticular adhesions, and (4) unbuckling of motion segments that have undergone disproportionate displacements. Results: There appear to be 2 separate modes of action from zygapophyseal HVLAT manipulation. Intra- articular mechanical effects of zygapophyseal HVLAT manipulation seem to be absolutely separate from and irrelevant to the occurrence of reported neurophysiologic effects. Cavitation should not be an absolute requirement for the mechanical effects to occur but may be a reliable indicator for successful joint gapping. Conclusions: It is hoped that identification of these unique neurophysiologic effects will provide enough theoretical reason for HVLAT manipulation and mobilization to be assessed independently as individual clinical interventions. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25:251-62) Key Indexing Terms: Chiropractic Manipulation; Synovial Fluid; Zygapophyseal Joint; Low Back Pain; Neurophysiology I NTRODUCTION S pinal manipulation has been used for more than 2000 years. 1 There have been many attempts to explain the physiology of the various effects of spinal manipu- lation, particularly those of the high-velocity low-amplitude thrust (HVLAT or HVT) type. As its name suggests, this type of manipulation uses a high velocity impulse or thrust which is applied to a diarthrodial synovial joint over a very short amplitude. This type of manipulation is usually associated with an audible crack, which is often viewed as signifying a successful manipulation....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/22/2011 for the course RSCH 2501 taught by Professor Brents.russell during the Winter '11 term at Life Chiropractic College West.

Page1 / 12

Evans 2002 SMT Prev Theories - R EVIEW OF THE L ITERATURE M...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online