This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
14.12 Game Theory
Fall 2005
Answers to Midterm 1, Fall 2005
Answer to Problem 1
a)
Player
1
has
the
same
payoﬀ
function
in
both
games,
so
player
1
trivially
has
the
same
preference
relation
over
lotteries
with
strategy
proﬁles
as
their
outcomes.
What
about
player
2?
In
other
words,
are
the
payoﬀs
for
player
2
in
the
game
on
the
right
a
nonnegative
aﬃne
transformation
of
the
payoﬀs
in
the
game
on
the
left?
In
yet
other
words,
do
there
exist
a
0and
b
with
0
a
+
b
=0
,
1
a
+
b
=1
,
4
a
+
b
=3
,
and 2
a
+
b
=
2?
You
can
see
that
we’d need
a
and
b
=
0
in
order
to
satisfy
the
ﬁrst
two
equations,
but
this
does
not
satisfy
the
third equation.
So
there
is
no
such
transformation,
and player
2
does
not
have
the
same
preference
relation
over
lotteries
with
strategy
proﬁles
as
their
outcomes.
b)
Are
the
payoﬀs
for
player
1
in
the
game
on
the
right
a
nonnegative
aﬃne
transformation
of
the
payoﬀs
in
the
game
on
the
left?
In
other
words,
do
there
exist
a
b
with
0
a
+
b
,
6
a
+
b
=4
,
2
a
+
b
=2
,
4
a
+
b
,
4
a
+
b
,
and 2
a
+
b
=
2?
Yes,
you
can
solve
the
equations
and see
that
a
/
2and
b
=
1
are
such
an
a
and
b.
Are
the
payoﬀs
for
player
2
in
the
game
on
the
right
a
nonnegative
aﬃne
transformation
of
the
payoﬀs
in
the
game
on
the
left?
In
other
words,
do
there
exist
a
b
with
1
a
+
b
,
4
a
+
b
,
4
a
+
b
,
7
a
+
b
,
−
2
a
+
b
=
−
1
,
and 1
a
+
b
=
0?
Yes,
you
can
solve
the
equations
and see
that
a
/
3and
b
=
−
1
/
3are
such
an
a
and
b.
So
yes,
both
players
have
the
same
preference
relation
on
lotteries
with
strategy
proﬁles
as
their
outcomes.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up
to
access the rest of the document.
 Spring '05
 MuhammadYildiz
 Game Theory

Click to edit the document details