Week2 Journal Assignment.docx - Fictitious Peer Assessment...

This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 3 pages.

Fictitious Peer Assessment Criteria (for practicing)Element 1: Did this assignment provide the name and the mission of the International NGO (non-governmental group)? –The name of the International NGO and the mission were both clearly stated= 10 points –Only one of these two components were provided= 5 points –Did not address this part of the assignment = 0 points Use the feedback box to provide your peer withthe reason you did or did not give full credit for this element. Weight: 1.00 Grade (max 10 points):
Element 2: Did this assignment summarize, in the student’s own words, some of the recent work toadvocate for and protect the human rights of a particular group or groups of people? –This was thoroughly described and answered = 10 points –Addressed most of the question, but could have been more detailed and elaborated further =7 pointsThe answer was very brief and in need of much further explanation= 4 points-Did not address this part of the assignment = 0 pointsUse the feedback box to provide your peer with the reason you did or did not give full credit for thiselement. Weight: 1.00 Grade (max 10 points):

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

End of preview. Want to read all 3 pages?

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Term
Winter
Professor
N/A
Tags

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture