SL-MorphParadox - The Paradox of SL Morphology Aranoff et...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–8. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The Paradox of SL Morphology Aranoff et al. Presented by Meghan McCartney & Odalis Avant
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
What is. .. ...simultaneous morphology? Morphemes are superimposed onto one another. Inflectional. Nonconcatenative ...sequential morphology? Morphemes are “strung together” (attach to base sign or root). Mainly derivational. Spoken languages are like this. More rare in signed languages.
Background image of page 2
Morphological Structure in SLs Simultaneous Morphology Sequential Morphology Extensive use across SLs Alters path, direction, etc of a sign Productive Limited use Language-specific Signer-specific Related to grammaticization
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
The Young Language Puzzle Researchers use young Creoles in their studies of SLs because both are relatively young. - Because of their age, Creoles have little inflectional and derivational morphology and no simultaneous morphology. - Instead, they rely on affixation, which varies from Creole to Creole. - In general, Creoles are not morphologically complex. The use of simultaneous morphology (which is complex) sets SLs apart from young Creoles.
Background image of page 4
The Morphological-Typology Puzzle Unlike Creoles, signed languages have a simultaneous morphological system, which makes heavy use of complex inflectional morphemes such as verb agreement, etc. - The ASL sign for LOOK-AT might contain 5 morphemes for example, in “he looked at it with relaxation and enjoyment for a long time.” SLs like ASL and ISL also use some simple derivational affixes, which fall under the category of sequential morphology. - These seldom occur within the languages and can even vary from speaker to speaker.
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Critical Question (Q) Why do signed languages have two radically different types of morphologies? (A) Similarities to Creoles - Because SLs and Creoles were created under similar conditions and are considered young languages, we expect them to behave similarly.
Background image of page 6
Critical Question (Q) Why do SLs have complex simultaneous morphology if they are comparable to young languages such as Creoles? (A) SL Modality
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 8
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 22

SL-MorphParadox - The Paradox of SL Morphology Aranoff et...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 8. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online