11:1:10 - International Security Notes Classic Neo-Liberal...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: International Security Notes 11/1/10 Classic Neo-Liberal Institutionalism • Is security like commerce? • No: “sucker payoff” in security may be state death • No: States are concerned with relative gains, not absolute gains • No: concerns about relative gains are, inherently, zero-sum in nature • No: even commerce among states can be zero-sum in nature • Empirical Problem • Soviet Union released its satellites in central and easter Europe and permitted uniFcation of Germany • Industrialized democracies did not balance against the US • US pursued new or expanded institutions (NATO, EU, NA¡TA, WTO) • Institutions, Security, and Ikenberry (Theoretical Problems) • How can dominant states be bound by institutions? • Reformulation: why do dominant states want to be bound by institutions? • dominant states because they are dominant can’t be directly bound by other states, therefore they must choose for themselves • How can other powerful states feel secure against domination or abandonment ?...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/01/2011 for the course PLSC 165 taught by Professor Matthewkocher during the Fall '10 term at Yale.

Page1 / 3

11:1:10 - International Security Notes Classic Neo-Liberal...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online