MIT2_017JF09_p25

MIT2_017JF09_p25 - up with our explicit solution for...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
25 GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION 84 25 Geometry Optimization Give the formulas for the radius and length of a closed, half-cylindrical tank (i.e., having a ”D”-like cross-section and flat ends) that will hold a given volume V . Your objective is to make the tank with minimum surface area. What are the specific dimensions if the volume is 100 m 3 ? The volume and surface area of the tank are given respectively by: V = π r 2 l 2 A = πrl + πr 2 +2 rl With the volume fixed, we seek the condition where the variation in A is zero, that is, ∂A/∂r = ∂A/∂l =0 , subject to the volume constraint. Following the example of Mid- dendorf and Engelmann (1998), we work this out using Lagrange multipliers, even though substitution as in the first problem could also be used. The area itself is the cost function, and we augment it as A ± = A + λ ( V πr 2 l/ 2) A ± = πrl + πr 2 +2 rl + λ ( V πr 2 l/ 2) Now we have to set the derivatives of A ± with respect to r and l to zero: ∂A ± =0 = πl +2 πr +2 l λπrl ∂r ∂A ± =0 = πr +2 r λπr 2 / 2 ∂l These relations along with the constraint V πr 2 l/ 2=0 , form three equations in three unknowns. Use the second equation to write λ in terms of r , and then use the third to write l in terms of r , and then substitute both of these into the first equation, to end
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: up with our explicit solution for radius: V (2 + ) 1 / 3 r = 2 This is exactly what you get if you use substitution to solve the problem, and in that case, we would put this r back into the constraint equation to solve for l (a little messy). But the Lagrange technique gives us more insight than this: if we use the rst and second of the three equations above, we can eliminate to nd that l = 2 r/ (2 + ) . This is a new property of the optimum solution, and we have simply 2 V (2 + ) 1 / 3 l = 2 + 2 If V = 100 m 3 , we nd r = 3 . 735 m and l = 4 . 564 m . MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 2.017J Design of Electromechanical Robotic Systems Fall 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms ....
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

MIT2_017JF09_p25 - up with our explicit solution for...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online