Unformatted text preview: 4. If affirmative action is a remedy, what is the source of the harm for this remedy? Does it make any difference according the justices? Identify each school of thought and the proponents. Critically evaluate the post 2000 decisions in light of Bakke. 5. The Supreme Court supports equality of opportunity. What precisely does this mean in the American context? Are the various areas of constitutional law supportive of a single or multiple views on the nature of equality? Why? 6. Does the Court’s application of the equal protection tiered framework appear consistent or inconsistent with its own internal logic? Is your answer dependent upon certain areas? Why is the Court consistent/inconsistent? Court dealing w...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 12/01/2011 for the course POL 152 taught by Professor Gates during the Fall '10 term at UC Davis.
- Fall '10