{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Lecture 7

Lecture 7 - Lecture710.18.2010 :IntentandImpact Levelof...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Lecture 7  10.18.2010 Proving A Classification: Intent and Impact  Equal protection Framework Level of  scrutiny Classification  or trigger example Governmental  Intermediate  scrutiny Quasi- suspect gender We do not hire  women/ no  women are  hired Strict scrutiny suspect “fundamental  rights” We do not hire  blacks/ no  blacks are  hired
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The importance of political, social, and economic dimensions of equality.  Voting and political equality Gomillion v. Lightfoot (1960) Result: It appears (but not discussed) that a racially disparate impact tends to  prove (probative) a constitutional violation (1960) Employment Washington v. Davis (1976) Feeney (1979), Heights (1977) Economics, the Poor, and Education San Antonio School Dist. v. Rodriquez (1973) Funding for schools through property taxes -> disparate impact across school  districts  The Crucial Post-Washington v. Davis Issue: is a particular classification the real 
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 2

Lecture 7 - Lecture710.18.2010 :IntentandImpact Levelof...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon bookmark
Ask a homework question - tutors are online