118 arthur, famine relief and the ideal moral code

118 Arthur, Famine Relief and the ideal Moral Code
Download Document
Showing pages : 1 of 1
This preview has blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version! View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Famine Relief and the ideal Moral Code Arthurs Main Argument 1. There is duty to provide aid whenever others are in greater need and will suffer without our help. 2. People who deserve or who have a right to their wealth are entitled to keep it. 3. For the most part, entitlements morally trumps the duty to aid others. 3. Therefore, for the most part, people are morally permitted to keep most of the wealth that the have by right or by desert. Entitlements Two kinds: derived from rights, derived from what one deserves. Rights Example: Suppose I have kidney disease and need a healthy kidney to survive. You have a healthy that is a match for mine. You dont need two kidneys. Does that mean you are morally required to give me your kidney? Arthur says no, because you have a right to control your body, and I dont have a right to control your body. Negative rights: right to be free from others interference. (My right to my kidney is a negative right.) Positive rights: If you promised me your kidney, I would acquire a positive right to it. ...
View Full Document