118 Arthur, Famine Relief and the ideal Moral Code

118 Arthur, Famine Relief and the ideal Moral Code - Famine...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Famine Relief and the ideal Moral Code Arthur’s Main Argument 1. There is duty to provide aid whenever others are in greater need and will suffer without our help. 2. People who deserve or who have a right to their wealth are entitled to keep it. 3. For the most part, entitlements morally trumps the duty to aid others. 3. Therefore, for the most part, people are morally permitted to keep most of the wealth that the have by right or by desert. Entitlements Two kinds: derived from rights, derived from what one deserves. Rights Example: Suppose I have kidney disease and need a healthy kidney to survive. You have a healthy that is a match for mine. You don’t need two kidneys. Does that mean you are morally required to give me your kidney? Arthur says no, because you have a right to control your body, and I don’t have a right to control your body. Negative rights: right to be free from others interference. (My right to my kidney is a negative right.) Positive rights: If you promised me your kidney, I would acquire a positive right to it. Negative rights are basic or natural.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 12/01/2011 for the course PHL 118 taught by Professor Garyfulle during the Fall '11 term at Central Mich..

Ask a homework question - tutors are online