This preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Life cycle theory of consumption
 incomes different in
 account for consumption Permanent income hypothesis
 is key
 Ct based on longterm income
 does not change with
 wealth made up of: o : constant proportion consumed
o : does not impact consumption
Investment
 investment in , not ﬁnancial, assets  how do ﬁrms decide whether to purchase capital?
 still based. on
o augment with rate,
PDV of stream of compare it with the l.estimate
o 5 =
2. compute PV of
 purchase in period. t: factory built, machine installed  operating in :ﬁrst “:1 earned
 discounted. PV of proﬁts:  account for depreciation in t+2:  putting both together: of expected proﬁt,
accounting for l l PV= ‘9 +—(1—5)He +...
1+rr (1+rt)(1+ nil) 3. costbeneﬁt analysis
 is the ? o comparing price of machine measured in terms of
(real cost) with the present value of
(real beneﬁt) How does this generalize to the overall level of investment in an economy?
_ It :
 positive relationship between and of
 similar to how : recall that dividends come from expectations of ﬁrms“ proﬁts Relationship btw investment and the stock market
 suppose K = and shares of stock =
 price per share = $ , price per machine = $
 what should ﬁrms do?  ﬁrms:
0 should of stock (each share generate $ )
o invest in (each unit of K costs $ )  James Tobin: there should be a between stock prices and investment levels does not require calculations of 0 stock prices do the same —> tells ﬁrm how much the public  ﬁrm’s role: compare price of of
capital with public’s willingness to
 stock prices is the public’s assessment of the ﬁrm’s success 0 high mkt price —> investors willing to invest I ﬁrm has
0 high prices also mean
I positive relationship btw
 to prove validity of this relationship:
0 plotted. (variable ), compared it to o closely matched
value of one—unit of K known as
 Tobin’s q constructed by: o ﬁnding (price of share X
number of shares)
0 ﬁnd the total value of (another form of raising
)
0 add value of stock and value of "bonds:
0 divide by the ( cost) 0 outcome: value of a unit of capital installed relative to its current purchase price
 the , the higher the value of capital relative to how
much it costs oq>1—) o magnitude of Tobin’s q indicates
should occur o from example, Tobin’s q is: = [$ >< ]/$  interesting note: the data between and
match up best when using:
0 — tells you whether or not to invest
o — tells us how much was invested
0 supports earlier assumption that investments take time to
be built and installed before in the
next period
 neat, but not altogether surprising:
0 investment decisions and stock prices
0 depend on expected , expected Special Case
 intuitive relationship btw , , and
 suppose ﬁxed over time
 simpliﬁes the earlier expression:  present value of profits is dependent on r (discounting future
payments) and 8 (accounts for decreasing K stock)
 replacing the previous investment function: ...
View Full
Document
 Spring '11
 Wolfson

Click to edit the document details