TA Comments about Marking

TA Comments about Marking - Question 1. Students did badly....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Question 1. Students did badly. Part a: many students did it right. Depending on the explanation I deducted 0.5 to 1.5 marks. If some students did it right but not good explanation I gave 4. Many also did it wrong. Just stated PPP but did not discuss the question or even how the question is related to PPP. I still gave 1 to 2.5 marks for that depending on the quality of the explanation. Part b: students did badly. Most got 50% mark. Most of them said true used Solow model. Very few talked about AK model. Some even said uncertain but in explanation talked only about Solow model. I gave 3.5 even if somebody explained one side of the story. And sometimes 4 if anybody discussed one side but at least said Uncertain. Few students (may be 1 or 2) tried to explain 2 sides I gave almost full mark depending on the quality of the answer. Part c: Most students did not understand the story or idea of the question i.e. open vs. closed economy argument. Almost 60% students talked about golden rule and then
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 12/02/2011 for the course ECON eco200 taught by Professor Wolfson during the Spring '11 term at University of Toronto.

Page1 / 2

TA Comments about Marking - Question 1. Students did badly....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online