BAJAJ - Yesterday, in my post I had suggested that...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Yesterday, in my post I had suggested that analyzing the new branding strategy adopted by Rajiv Bajaj of Bajaj Auto would be a great learning experience. I had suggested that we will analyze it from two perspectives. First, I will discuss it from the point of view of what management theory says. Positioning refers to how the brand is perceived in the mind of the customer. In other words, what does the customer think of the brand. Perception of the brand can be created in the mind of the customer or the customer develops it on its own taking his experience with the brand into consideration. Positioning is what you do to the mind of the customer and not what you do to the product in the factory. In simple terms, a brand should mean one and only one thing to the customer. In other words, a brand can have just one positioning. The positioning that each brand occupies in the mind of the customer has to be one, preferably unique. So, what Rajiv Bajaj is trying to do is exactly right because today the Bajaj brand means too many things to too many people. Even in the Rahul Bajaj Group, it means too many things to too many people, that is, finance, insurance, auto rickshaw, high-end and low-end bikes. As such, Rajiv is correct when he says that the Bajaj brand has been diluted and stretched beyond what is logical. The other part of the branding and positioning theory that needs to be discussed is the issue of brand extension or the use of an umbrella brand. Brand extensions by and large do not work. It has financial and some marketing logic on its side but not the logic of the mind of the customer. Remember, it is the mind of the customers where all the marketing battles are lost and won and not in the retail stores. The financial logic behind adopting brand extension strategy (trade acceptance, consumer acceptance, lower advertising costs, corporate image) is so overwhelming that it is very difficult to counter it. Because of the overwhelming financial logic in favor of brand extensions, a large number of companies adopt the strategy. Colgate has adopted brand extension as a strategy. They have Colgate toothpaste, Colgate toothbrushes, Colgate Dant Manjan, Colgate powder and more. But if you visit a Kirana shop and say, “Please give me a Colgate,” the shopkeeper will either hand you Colgate toothpaste or ask you what do you want (toothpaste, toothbrush or talcum powder). Colgate was positioned as a toothpaste and that is the positioning that the customers remember in their mind. I recently noticed that the only TV commercial that ones sees on the TV is of Colgate toothpaste and not for the brand extension products. This clearly suggests that either the brand extension products of Colgate are not very successful or they are so popular that they do not need any advertising. I will let you decide which is the case. However, I am sure that Colgate toothpaste is the highest selling and the most profitable product under the Colgate brand. The reason-Colgate is positioned in the mind of the customer
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 5

BAJAJ - Yesterday, in my post I had suggested that...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online