problem set 3 - #1) (a) BMI = 28.44 0.882 0 = 28.44 For...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
#1) (a) · 28.44 0.882 0 28.44 BMI = - × = For individuals in urban areas we have Urban = 1, so then · 28.44 0.882 1 27.558 BMI = - × = (b) The slope coefficient 1 ˆ 0.882 β = - is the point estimate of the difference. The standard error is s e = 0.185. The approximate confidence interval is CI = (-0.882 – 1.96*0.185, -0.882 + 1.96*0.185) = (-1.2446, -0.5194) (c) If I suspect that the variance of people’s BMI in urban locations is not the same as the variance of people’s BMI in rural locations, then I suspect that there is a heteroskedasticity problem, which means that the variance of the error term is not constant across all the values of the independent variable(s). This would be a violation of the regression assumption that ( 29 2 0, i N ε σ : , where 2 is constant, and it doesn’t change across levels of the independent variable(s).
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
#2) 6.2 (a) Yes, workers with college degrees earn $5.46/hour more, on average, than those without a college degree. 6.2 (b)
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 12/04/2011 for the course ECONOMICS 201 taught by Professor Rcollier during the Spring '10 term at Portland CC.

Page1 / 3

problem set 3 - #1) (a) BMI = 28.44 0.882 0 = 28.44 For...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online