{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

sl2classno

# sl2classno - IDEAL CLASSES AND SL 2 KEITH CONRAD 1...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: IDEAL CLASSES AND SL 2 KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction A standard group action in complex analysis is the action of GL 2 ( C ) on the Riemann sphere C ∪ {∞} by linear fractional transformations (M¨ obius transformations): (1.1) a b c d z = az + b cz + d . We need to allow the value ∞ since cz + d might be 0. (If that happens, az + b 6 = 0 since ( a b c d ) is invertible.) When z = ∞ , the value of (1.1) is a/c ∈ C ∪ {∞} . It is easy to see this action of GL 2 ( C ) on the Riemann sphere is transitive (that is, there is one orbit): for every z ∈ C , (1.2) a a- 1 1 1 ∞ = a, so the orbit of ∞ passes through all points. In fact, since ( a a- 1 1 1 ) has determinant 1, the action of SL 2 ( C ) (the 2 × 2 matrices with determinant 1) on C ∪ {∞} is transitive. However, the action of SL 2 ( R ) on the Riemann sphere is not transitive. The reason is the formula for imaginary parts under a real linear fractional transformation: Im az + b cz + d = ( ad- bc ) Im( z ) | cz + d | 2 when ( a b c d ) ∈ GL 2 ( R ). Thus, z and ( a b c d ) z have the same imaginary part when ( a b c d ) has determinant 1. The action of SL 2 ( R ) on the Riemann sphere has three orbits: R ∪ {∞} , the upper half-plane h = { x + iy : y > } , and the lower half-plane. To see that the action of SL 2 ( R ) on h is transitive, pick x + iy with y > 0. Then √ y x/ √ y 1 / √ y i = x + iy, and the matrix here is in SL 2 ( R ). (This action of SL 2 ( R ) on the upper half-plane is essentially one of the models for the isometries of the hyperbolic plane.) The action (1.1) makes sense with C replaced by any field K , and gives a transitive group action of GL 2 ( K ) on the set K ∪{∞} . Just as over the complex numbers, the formula (1.2) shows the action of SL 2 ( K ) on K ∪ {∞} is transitive. Now take K to be a number field, and replace the group SL 2 ( K ) with the subgroup SL 2 ( O K ). We ask: how many orbits are there for the action of the group SL 2 ( O K ) on K ∪ {∞} ? Theorem 1.1. For a number field K , the number of orbits for SL 2 ( O K ) on K ∪ {∞} is the class number of K . 1 2 KEITH CONRAD Therefore there are finitely many orbits, and moreover this finiteness is a non-trivial statement! In Section 2, we will prove SL 2 ( O K ) acts transitively on K ∪ {∞} if and only if K has class number 1. This is the simplest case of Theorem 1.1. As preparation for the general case, in Section 3 we will change our language from K ∪{∞} to the projective line over K , whose relevance (among other things) is that it removes the peculiar status of ∞ . (It seems useful to treat the special case of class number 1 without mentioning the projective line, if only to underscore what it is one is gaining by using the projective line in the general case.) In Section 4 we prove Theorem 1.1 in general by giving a bijection between the SL 2 ( O K )-orbits and ideal classes in K ....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 6

sl2classno - IDEAL CLASSES AND SL 2 KEITH CONRAD 1...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online