British reviewers were generally unimpressed

British reviewers were generally unimpressed -...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
British reviewers were generally unimpressed.  The Spectator  (August 17, 1951) considered it to be  "inconclusive" in theme and a bit too "showy."  Times Literary Supplement  (September 7, 1951)  complains that the "endless stream of blasphemy and obscenity" gets boring after the first chapter. The novel did well commercially but was not the most popular work of fiction in 1951. It was on the  New York Times  best-seller list for thirty weeks in all but never climbed higher than fourth. Herman  Wouk's  The Caine Mutiny  and James Jones'  From Here to Eternity , for example, sold more copies  initially. As time passed, however, Salinger's work continued to sell and to attract critical interest. Jack  Salzman (in  New Essays on The Catcher in the Rye , published by Cambridge University Press)  points out that, by 1954,  Catcher  could be purchased in translation in Denmark, Germany, France, 
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 12/05/2011 for the course ENGLISH 101 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '11 term at Texas State.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online