{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Much of the disputation that has occurred in philosophical writings has been due either to ambiguity

Much of the disputation that has occurred in philosophical writings has been due either to ambiguity

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Much of the disputation that has occurred in philosophical writings has been due either to ambiguity  or vagueness in the use of words. Since words derive their meaning from the way in which they are  used and different people do not always use words in the same way to express what they mean, it is  easy to understand why disputes of this nature should arise. Hume states that he has tried to avoid  this difficulty by a sparse use of the terms virtues and vices. He has chosen rather to speak of those  actions which are useful and agreeable or their opposites. In spite of this caution on his part, some of  his critics have insisted that he used the terms virtues and vices to include talents or capacities and  a lack of these, whereas he should have made a clear distinction between virtues and talents or  vices and a lack of certain abilities. It is in defense of the way he has used the terms virtues and 
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}