BrownianMotion - previous index next Brownian Motion...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
previous index next Brownian Motion Michael Fowler, U. Va. 8/1/08 See Applet here ! Introduction: Jiggling Pollen Granules In 1827 Robert Brown, a well-known botanist, was studying sexual relations of plants, and in particular was interested in the particles contained in grains of pollen. He began with a plant ( Clarckia pulchella ) in which he found the pollen grains were filled with oblong granules about 5 microns long. He noticed that these granules were in constant motion, and satisfied himself that this motion was not caused by currents in the fluid or evaporation. Smaller spherical grains, which at first he took to be oblongs end-on, but later realized weren’t, had even more vigorous motion. He thought at first that he was looking at the plant equivalent of sperm—they were jiggling around because they were alive. To check this, he did the same experiment with dead plants. There was just as much jiggling. Perhaps all organic matter, everything that ever was alive, still contained some mysterious life force at this microscopic level? Sure enough, he found the movement in tiny fragments of fossilized wood! But then he went on to find it in matter that never was alive—tiny particles of window glass, and even dust from a stone that had been part of the Sphinx. The movement evidently had nothing to do with the substance ever being alive or dead, much to Brown’s surprise. So what was causing it? Perhaps it was evaporation currents, or the incident light energy, or just tiny unnoticed vibrations. But none of these explanations was very satisfactory. Half a century later, a new possible explanation emerged. The kinetic theory of heat developed by Maxwell, Boltzmann and others was gaining credence. If all the molecules in the fluid were indeed in vigorous motion, maybe these tiny granules were being moved around by this constant battering from all sides as the fluid molecules bounced off. But there was a problem with this explanation: didn’t it violate the second law of thermodynamics? It had been well established that energy always degrades, as friction slows movement kinetic energy goes to heat energy. This seemed to be the other way round—the molecular battering was certainly disorganized heat energy, but when the granule moved it had evidently gained kinetic energy. Since many scientists regarded the second law as an absolute truth, they were very skeptical of this explanation. In 1888, French experimentalist Léon Gouy investigated the movement in detail, finding it to be more lively in low viscosity liquids. He established that it was unaffected by intense illumination or by strong electromagnetic fields. Despite the second law, Guoy believed— correctly—the random motion was indeed generated by thermal molecular collisions.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
2 It’s easy to see the Brownian movement, or Brownian motion (it’s called both) by looking through a microscope at tobacco smoke in air. We have a movie here .
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 7

BrownianMotion - previous index next Brownian Motion...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online