Poli 260 - Week 6 (Lecture)

Poli 260 - Week 6 (Lecture) - Poli 260 THE IMPACT OF...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Poli 260 THE IMPACT OF DOMESTIC POLITICS ON INTERNATIONAL POLITICS RECALL: - States pursue survival and security in an anarchic world - Uncertainty + offence = fear of CD - Why are we not all dead? Or why aren't we always at DD? - States have incentives to cooperate (CC > DD), providing the other state wants to cooperate too - Save costs from defecting (military) - Alliances: aim to deter challenger, but if not. .. - Defeat challenger (e.g. Germany) - International organizations (why do they exist at all [Keohane]?): - Lower costs of CC (transaction costs) - cheaper than negotiating deals - Reduce uncertainty by sharing information FOREIGN POLICY AND DOMESTIC POLITICS - Two visions of foreign policy: Roosevelt (realist) vs Wilson (liberal) Do domestic politics matter? - Roosevelt: no, only balance of power matters - Wilson: yes, democracies are peaceful (more peaceful than autocratic regimes) - Interest in promoting shared values of democracy around the world Should foreign policy be moral (should we care about things other than guns and bombs)? - Roosevelt: no, foreign policy should maximize power - Wilson: yes, foreign policy should promote moral values - Wilson: domestic politics (institutions + morality/ideology) matter What would John M. Say? - Wilson is foolish - Roosevelt is right - States should not care about domestic politics - But. ..in practise, states do consider domestic politics when designing foreign policy - E.g. Communism vs. capitalism - Does this make sense? - John says no - But can states be doing this for good reason? - Used to think domestic politics didn't matter because: - Structure (balance of power) was what drove state behaviour - All leaders would behave the same way, given a similar balance of power - States basing foreign policy on domestic politics were foolish (e.g. Cold War) How We Found Domestic Politics Mattered - Democracies were relatively uncommon - The few democracies that exited did fight wars just like everyone else - But as the number of democracies expanded, scholars noticed that while democracies fought non- democracies, democracies almost never fought each other Definitions - There are a range of regime-types Democracy : ruler not selected by watery tart - Free and competitive elections (i.e. govt can lose) - Wide franchise (range of people can vote - number of people to vote is not restricted) 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Poli 260 THE IMPACT OF DOMESTIC POLITICS ON INTERNATIONAL POLITICS - Leadership open beyond narrow elite (not restricted to a specific group) Liberal : ruler can't repress people in arbitrary fashion - Role of government to protect and allow individual liberty (with some boundaries) - When government infringes on an individual's rights, rule of law protects that individual from arbitrary treatment - Non-state liberal institutions (eg free press) - not controlled by state Liberal Democracy - Democracy (elections) + rule of law (individual rights, freedom of press/assembly) - E.g. Canada - Most autocracies are illiberal (e.g. Nazi Germany) - But you can have illiberal democracy
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 12/07/2011 for the course POLI 260 taught by Professor Sens,allen during the Winter '09 term at UBC.

Page1 / 7

Poli 260 - Week 6 (Lecture) - Poli 260 THE IMPACT OF...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online