This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: 18.100B/C: Fall 2008 Solutions to Homework 3 1. By condition (a), E is nonempty. By condition (b), E is open. By condition (c), every point that is a limit of a sequence of points in E is itself in E . Note that if e is a limit point of E , we can choose a sequence of points of E whose limit is e : choose x n to be a arbitrary point of E that lies in the ball B ( e, 1 n ) and then lim n x n = e . Thus, E contains all its limit points and so E is closed. By Homework 2, Problem 8, a nonempty open and closed subset of a connected metric space must be the entire space, so E = X as desired. 2.(a) Equivalent: Suppose x n p . Then for all r > 0 there is some M N such that n M implies d ( x n , p ) < r . Choose any N and define r = N 1 , and with the corresponding M set = M 1 , so M =  1 . Then we have that for all n  1 , d ( x n , p ) < N 1 . Thus, for every N there is some > 0 such that for all n  1 , d ( x n , p ) < N 1 and so statement (a) is true. Conversely, suppose that statement (a) holds of a sequence x n and a point p . Then for all M N there is some r > 0 such that for all n r 1 , d ( x n , p ) < M 1 . Choose any > 0 and choose some M  1 , so M 1 . For this value of M these is an associated value of r , and pick some integer N r 1 . Then for all n N we have d ( x n , p ) < M 1 . Thus, for all > 0 there is some N N such that n N implies d ( x n , p ) < and so x n p . (The moral of this question: variables are just placeholders, and theres nothing special about the letters N and .) (b) Not equivalent: consider X = R and x n = 1 n . Then lim n x n = 0. However, for any N N , with = 1 N +1 and n = N we have d ( x n , 0) = d ( x N , 0) = 1 N > 1 N +1 = , so the given statement is false. (In fact, statement (b) is equivalent to the statement x n is eventually constant.) (Moral: quantifiers matter.) (c) Not equivalent: consider X = R and the sequence x n defined by x 2 n = 1 n , x 2 n 1 = n . (The first few terms of this sequence are 1 , 1 , 2 , 1 2 , 3 , 1 3 , . . . .) The range of this sequence has a single limit point at 0, but the sequence x n has no limit. (Another counterexample is the sequence defined by x 2 n = 1 n , x 2 n 1 = 1, since 1 is a limit of a subsequence, but an isolated point of the range.) (d) Not equivalent: consider X = R and x n = ( 1) n , then the range { 1 , 1 } is finite and hence B r ( p ) C { 1 , 1 } is finite for all r > 0. However, the sequence is known to diverge. (On the other hand, the statement For all r > 0 the set { n N  x n B r ( p ) C } is finite. is equivalent to convergence; see Rudin 3.2(a).) 3. Suppose s n z . Then for all > 0 there is some N N such that for all n N we have d C ( s n , z ) < . But d C ( s n , z ) =  s n z   s n    z  = d R (  s n  ,  z  ), so for all > 0 there is some N N such that for all...
View Full
Document
 Fall '10
 Prof.KatrinWehrheim

Click to edit the document details