18.100pset5

18.100pset5 - 18.100B/C: Fall 2008 Solutions to Homework 5...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 18.100B/C: Fall 2008 Solutions to Homework 5 Every use of the phrase “by comparison” in the following solutions is a reference to Rudin’s 3.25, the comparison test. 1.(a) We have 0 < a n , so < a n 2 + n 2 a n = 1 n 2 + 2 /a n < 1 n 2 . Thus ∑ ∞ n =1 a n 2+ n 2 a n converges by comparison with the convergent series ∑ ∞ n =1 1 n 2 . (b) Following the hint, we first suppose a n 6→ 0. Then there is some r > 0 such that a n > r for infinitely many values of n . But then a n 2+ a n = 1 1+ 2 an > 1 1+ 2 r = r 2+ r > 0 for infinitely many n so a n 2+ a n 6→ 0 and thus ∑ ∞ n =1 a n 2+ a n diverges (Rudin 3.23). Now instead suppose a n → 0. Choose some N such that for all n ≥ N we have a n < 1. Then we have a n a n +2 > a n 3 , ∑ ∞ n =1 a n a n +2 diverges by comparison with 1 3 ∑ ∞ n =1 a n . 2.(a) The first part of the problem is an ugly-looking computation. Here’s a short version (feel free to add your own summation signs): the left side contains terms of the form a 2 i b 2 j for i,j ∈ { 1 ,...,n } , and each term appears exactly once. The first term on the left contains terms of the form a 2 i b 2 i , each appearing once, and terms of the form a i b i a j b j for i 6 = j , each appearing once. The second term on the left is the complicated part: for i 6 = j we get one-half copy of a 2 i b 2 j , one half copy of a 2 j b 2 i and one negative copy of a i b j a j b i , while for i = j we get no contribution. Observe that summing one-half copy of a 2 i b 2 j and one half copy of a 2 j b 2 i over all pairs i 6 = j gives you the same thing as summing one copy of a 2 i b 2 j over all pairs i 6 = j , and celebrate. (Note that this argument glosses over the formal justification for its claims. In particular, a more careful solution-writer would have explicitly used an inductive proof.) Since squares of real numbers are nonnegative, it follows immediately that...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/07/2011 for the course MATH 18.100B taught by Professor Prof.katrinwehrheim during the Fall '10 term at MIT.

Page1 / 4

18.100pset5 - 18.100B/C: Fall 2008 Solutions to Homework 5...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online