kavajecz - Flight-to-Quality or Flight-to-Liquidity?...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Flight-to-Quality or Flight-to-Liquidity? Evidence from the Euro-Area Bond Market Alessandro Beber, Michael W. Brandt and Kenneth A. Kavajecz ∗ This version: June 2006 Abstract Do bond investors demand credit quality or liquidity? The answer is both, but at different times and for different reasons. Using data on the Euro-area government bond market, which features a unique negative correlation between credit quality and liquidity across countries, we show that the bulk of sovereign yield spreads is explained by differences in credit quality, though liquidity plays a non-trivial role especially for low credit risk countries and during times of heightened market uncertainty. In contrast, the destination of large flows into the bond market is determined almost exclusively by liquidity. We conclude that credit quality matters for bond valuation but that, in times of market stress, investors chase liquidity, not credit quality. ∗ Beber is at HEC, University of Lausanne, Brandt is at the Fuqua School of Business, Duke University and is also affiliated with the NBER, and Kavajecz is at the School of Business, University of Wisconsin - Madison. We gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments from seminar participants at Notre Dame University, University of North Carolina, and the University of Wisconsin. We have also benefited greatly from the comments of Shane Corwin, Joel Hasbrouck, Paul Schultz and Richard Sheehan. All remaining errors are our own. Address correspondence to Kenneth Kavajecz, School of Business, University of Wisconsin – Madison, 975 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53706. Phone: (608) 265-3494 or [email protected] 1. Introduction In times of economic distress, we often observe investors rebalance their portfolios toward less risky and more liquid securities, especially in fixed income markets. This phenomenon is commonly referred to as a flight-to-quality and a flight-to-liquidity, respectively. While the economic motives of these two phenomena are clearly distinct from each other, empirically disentangling a flight-to-quality from a flight-to-liquidity is difficult because, as Ericsson and Renault (2006) show in the context of the U.S. corporate bond market, these two attributes of a fixed income security (credit quality and liquidity) are usually positively correlated. For example, U.S. Treasuries have less credit risk and are more liquid than corporate bonds. When we observe investors reduce their corporate bond holdings and increase their Treasury holdings it is therefore unclear whether they do so because of credit or liquidity concerns. The goal of our paper is to determine empirically the extent to which investors are concerned about credit quality and liquidity unconditionally, as well as conditional on times of heightened market uncertainty or rebalancing activity. We accomplish this by studying yield spreads and orderflow in the Euro-area government bond market which exhibits a strong and unique negative relation between credit quality and liquidity, as opposed to the strong positive...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/08/2011 for the course CIS 625 taught by Professor Michaelkearns during the Spring '12 term at Penn State.

Page1 / 37

kavajecz - Flight-to-Quality or Flight-to-Liquidity?...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online