book club FINAL

book club FINAL - Analyst Roths study began with three...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Analyst Roth’s study began with three related questions (pg 197). 1.) How does Wall Street’s system of pay for performance allow gender inequality to persist? 2.) How do some women manage to become highly successful on Wall Street? 3.) What can we learn from the Wall Street case about gender inequality more generally? These questions help explain the processes that lead to gender inequality in the workplace. 4.) If women perform as well as men when they share the same productivity-related characteristics, work in the same organizations, and work the same number of hours, then why are there gender differences in compensation on Wall Street? 5.) What affects the evaluations of managers, peers, and subordinates 6.) Is there more or less gender inequality on Wall Street in comparison to other industries? 7.) Are some areas of Wall Street better for women? (Gender pay gap influenced by- homophily, and work-family conflict) MAIN FINDINGS Roth’s central finding is that, “men and women who obtained comparable training and entered the marketplace during the same period still found themselves separated by substantial gender inequality” (pg 3). Many of these gender inequalities take the form of discrimination within jobs on Wall Street despite pressures against discrimination (10). Although sometimes subtle, these forms of discrimination operate through interpersonal and organizational dynamics within Wall Street firms (Roth pg 8). Interpersonal and organizational factors subtly and most of the time unintentionally re-create inequality (pg 10). PAY FOR PERFORMANCE One example form of subtle discrimination that occurs within Wall Street are performance evaluations which Roth finds to be caused by structural discrimination, not individual acts of meanness. Roth finds that pay does not always reflect performance and that opportunity is institutionally structured which affects the career paths of modern workplaces and workers. “Performance evaluations may be affected by subjective
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 12/08/2011 for the course SOC 320 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '11 term at UMass (Amherst).

Page1 / 3

book club FINAL - Analyst Roths study began with three...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online