3 - contcomp3 filled - Comparison of Open-Loop &...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Comparison of Open-Loop & Closed-Loop Control Example: Disk Drive Head Objective: precise control over the velocity of the head ME575 Session 3 – Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Control Comparison School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University Slide 1 Comparison of Open-Loop & Closed-Loop Control Model: V (s) Km τms + 1 ω(s) where and 0.9K m ≤ K m ≤ 1.1K m K m is the nominal value based on motor data sheet Objective: make output ω(t) follow specified reference ωd(t) with uncertainty in Km ME575 Session 3 – Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Control Comparison School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University Slide 2 1 Open-Loop Control ωd(s) Controller ME575 Session 3 – Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Control Comparison C V (s) Motor Km τms + 1 ω(s) School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University Slide 3 Open-Loop Control - Problems • Controller is usually unrealizable • Unstable plant cannot be stabilized • Right-half-plane plant zeros cause unstable controller ME575 Session 3 – Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Control Comparison School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University Slide 4 2 Open-Loop Control Relax objective so that ω(t) → ωd(t) at steady-state. Assume setpoint is constant, i.e., ωd = ωdss. Apply the Final Value Theorem (FVT): ωss = lim sω ( s ) = s →0 e ss open = ωdss − ωss = ωdss − loop ME575 Session 3 – Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Control Comparison Km K⎞ ⎛ ωdss = ⎜ 1 − m ⎟ ωdss Km Km ⎠ ⎝ School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University Slide 5 Open-Loop Control (cont.) e ss open = ωdss − ωss = ωdss − loop ME575 Session 3 – Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Control Comparison Km K⎞ ⎛ ωdss = ⎜ 1 − m ⎟ ωdss Km Km ⎠ ⎝ School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University Slide 6 3 Closed-Loop Control ωd(s) Pre-filter K0 Controller + − K / Km V (s) Motor Km τms + 1 ω(s) Sensor K0 Convert to a unity feedback block diagram. ME575 Session 3 – Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Control Comparison School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University Slide 7 Closed-Loop Control Controller ωd(s) + − K0 ω(s) = K / Km V (s) Motor Km τms + 1 ω(s) K 0KK m / K m ωd ( s ) τms + 1 + K 0KK m / K m ME575 Session 3 – Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Control Comparison School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University Slide 8 4 Closed-Loop Control (cont.) E ( s ) = ωd ( s ) − ω ( s ) = e ss = lim sE ( s ) = s →0 τms + 1 ωdss τms + 1 + K 0KK m / K m s 1 ωdss 1 + K 0KK m / K m For K0 = 1 (no loss of generality): e ss closed = loop 1 ωdss 1 + KK m / K m ME575 Session 3 – Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Control Comparison School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University Slide 9 Closed-Loop Control (cont.) e ss closed = loop 1 ωdss 1 + KK m / K m ME575 Session 3 – Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Control Comparison School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University Slide 10 5 Comparison of Open-Loop & Closed-Loop Control • Closed-loop (feedback) control can reduce steady-state errors with modeling uncertainty for high enough gain, relative to open-loop control. • High-gain feedback control also reduces errors to unknown disturbance inputs. • Feedback control can be destabilizing. ME575 Session 3 – Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Control Comparison School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University Slide 11 6 ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/09/2011 for the course ME 575 taught by Professor Meckl during the Fall '10 term at Purdue University-West Lafayette.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online