371chapter12f2011a-2 - Chapter 12 Inference for Two...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Chapter 12 Inference for Two Numerical Populations 12.1 Comparing the Means of Two Populations; Independent Samples We have two populations. If you want to study them individually, use the methods of Chapter 11. In this section we learn how to compare the populations, usingestimationandhypothesistesting. In this section we assume that we have random samples from the two populations and that the samples are independent. (Independent samples were discussed in Chapter 9.) We begin with some notation. The Frst population has mean μ 1 ,s tanda rddev ia t ion σ 1 and variance σ 2 1 .Thesecondpopu la t ionhasmean μ 2 ,standarddeviation σ 2 and variance σ 2 2 . Of course, the researcher does not know these six numbers, butNaturedoes. We begin with the problem of estimation. Our goal is to estimate μ 1 - μ 2 .Ourda tacons is tof independent random samples from the two populations. Denote the data from the Frst population by: x 1 ,x 2 ,...,x n 1 ;anddeno tetheda taf romthe second population by: y 1 ,y 2 ,...,y n 2 . It is, of course, important to look at the data and think about the purpose of the research. If it seems reasonable scientiFcally to compare the two populations by comparing their means, then we will proceed with the methods introduced in this section. We summarize our two sets of data by computing their means and standard deviations, which are denoted by: ¯ X,S 1 , ¯ Y and S 2 when we view them as random variables, with observed values: ¯ x,s 1 , ¯ y and s 2 . Our point estimate of μ 1 - μ 2 is ¯ X - ¯ Y . There is a CLT for this problem too. ±irst, it shows us how to standardize our estimator: W = ( ¯ X - ¯ Y ) - ( μ 1 - μ 2 ) ± ( σ 2 1 /n 1 )+( σ 2 2 /n 2 ) . (12.1) 139
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Second, it states that we can approximate probabilities for W by using the snc and that in the limit as both sample sizes become larger and larger, the approximations are accurate. First, we need to eliminate the unknown parameters in the denominator of W .Becau sethe re are now two unknown parameters where in Chapter 11 there was one, this will require additional care. Second, we will need to decide what to use for our reference curve: the snc of the CLT (and Slutsky) or the t curves of Gosset. When all the smoke has cleared, statisticians suggest three methods, referred to in my text as Cases 1, 2 and 3. I personally think that Case 2 is scienti±cally worthless, so we won’t cover it. (It is mathematically interesting, which is, in my opinion, why books feature it. Me, I put it in my book because I did not want to automatically lose the ‘Case 2 market.’) We will begin with Case 3; I will follow the popular terminology and call this the large sample approximation method. 12.1.1 Case 3: The Large Sample Approximation Case 3 makes a lot of sense to the new student of Statistics: simply replace the population variances by their corresponding sample variances. This changes our earlier W to W 3 .(The3isforCase3 .) W 3 = ( ¯ X - ¯ Y ) - ( μ 1 - μ 2 ) ± ( S 2 1 /n 1 )+( S 2 2 /n 2 ) . (12.2) Case 3 states that we should use the snc as our reference curve.Th isleadstothefo l low ingformu la for the CI for μ 1 - μ 2 : x -
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 12/10/2011 for the course STATS 371 taught by Professor Hanlon during the Fall '11 term at University of Wisconsin.

Page1 / 12

371chapter12f2011a-2 - Chapter 12 Inference for Two...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online