Assignment for Chapter 2

Assignment for Chapter 2 - UNITED STATES, Plaintiff,...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Memo To: Julia Dunlap From: Date: October 18, 2004 Re: Legal Research Assignment for Chapter 2 1. a. The name on the case located at 519 U.S. 172 (1997) is: OLD CHIEF v. UNITED STATES b. The Court holds that if a defendant charged with violating § 922(g) (1) concedes his prior felony conviction, a district court abuses its discretion if it admits evidence of the defendant’s prior crime that raises the risk of a verdict :tainted by improper considerations.” c. Anthony Scalia, Associate Justice was assigned to the Fifth Circuit during the period of time covered by volume 519 of the United State Reports. 2. a . The name of the case in volume 506 of the U.S. Reports in which the plaintiff’s name is Herrera is: Herrera v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division b . The solicitor general of the United States when the case was decided was Kenneth Starr. 3. a. North Carolina - Forth Circuit b. Illinois - Seventh Circuit c. Texas - Firth Circuit 4. a. The name of the case located at 197 F.3d 24 is:
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. 8.0 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN BARNSTABLE COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; RAYMOND W. COBB, Defendants MARY VIRGINIA BRANDT RUXTON; ESTATE OF JEAN STEVENSON CLARK; NORMAN S. ROSE; ELMER Q. ROSE; AUSTIN L. ROSE, ESTATE OF PRISCILLA L. ROSE; JOHN D. HALLISEY, Defendants, Appellees 1 ROGER TREAT JACKSON, JR.; MARGERY JACKSON CHAMBERS; BETSEY JACKSON PATTERSON; BARBARA JACKSON ALLGEIER, Defendants, Appellants ARTHUR C. CROCE, Appellant. b . The judge that issued the opinion of the court was Kermit Lipez 5. a. The name of the case at 77 F. Supp. 2 nd 859 is: Levi MOHNEY, et al., Plaintiff, v. USA HOCKEY, INC., et al., Defendant. b. The court that decided this case was the United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. c. James R. Oates, Merrillville, IN, Fred C. Jug, Brandt, Milnes & Rea, Pittsburg, PA, represented Levi Mohney. 2...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/10/2011 for the course PARALEGAL 202 taught by Professor Dunlap during the Spring '04 term at UCSD.

Page1 / 2

Assignment for Chapter 2 - UNITED STATES, Plaintiff,...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online