{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Week 9 Capstone - PepsiCo has fluctuating margins Is there...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
After reviewing the Annual reports from both PepsiCo, Inc and the Coca-Cola Company, I would have to invest my money with Coca-Cola. While it does appear that both of these beverage manufactures would provide a good return on my investment, I feel as though the profitability being represented by Coca-Cola would offer the best opportunity for long-term growth. Coca-Cola was able to reduce their long-term liabilities as well as their short term liabilities. Coca-Cola appears to have a lower cost for goods sold than does PepsiCo. During the 2004-2005 time frame, PepsiCo reported lower income which could have been the result of higher cost for goods sold. One primary factor for choosing Coca-Cola over PepsiCo is the profit margins that were reported by each company. Coca-Cola reported slow, but steady profit margins, whereas
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: PepsiCo has fluctuating margins. Is there a reason that one company can have steady margins and another will have fluctuating margins other than possible miscalculations from internal sources in regards to sales, marketing or manufacturing strategies? I would prefer to go with slow and steady, verses fluctuating highs and lows. Both Coca-Cola and PepsiCo had a significant drop in the amount of capitol that was reported. PepsiCo capitol dropped by $839 Million and Coca-Cola dropped by $734 Million. Another factor to consider would be the Payout Ratio. During 2005, Coca-Cola had a payout ratio of nearly .55%, as opposed to only a .40% payout offered by PepsiCo. For these reasons, I would invest my money with Coca-Cola....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online