Mvds-ullman - NORMALIZATION 1 Decomposition and FDs x Functional dependencies can be used in designing a relational database to remove the

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: NORMALIZATION 1 Decomposition and FDs x Functional dependencies: can be used in designing a relational database to remove the undesired properties x Normalization using FDs:  Boyce­Codd Normal Form (BCNF)  3rd Normal Form (3NF) Farkas CSCE 520 2 Boyce­Codd Normal Form x A relation is in Boyce­Codd Normal Form if for all FDs X A in S+ over R at least one of the followings hold:  X A is a trivial FD  if X A is a nontrivial FD then X is a superkey for schema R x Example:  R(Name,Breed,Date, Kennel)  FD: Name,Breed,Date Kennel  R is in BCNF Farkas CSCE 520 3 Decomposition into BCNF x Compute S+ (for FDs in S); x if there is a R that is not BCNF then ­ let XA a non­trivial FD on R s.t. XR is not in S+ and X ∩ A = ∅; ­ Decompose R into: – R1(R-A) – R2(X,A) Farkas CSCE 520 4 BCNF x Not every BCNF decomposition is dependency preserving x Example:  FDs: AB C and C B  Keys: {A,B} and {A,C}  C B is BCNF violation, therefore need to decompose to R1=(AC) and R2=(BC)  Decomposition cannot enforce AB C! Farkas CSCE 520 5 Third Normal Form x Modifies BCNF conditions so no need to decompose in this problem situation x An attribute is prime if it is member of any key x X A violates 3NF if and only if X is not a superkey and also A is not a prime. Farkas CSCE 520 6 3NF Conditions x A relation is in 3NF if for all FDs X A in S+ over R at least one of the followings hold:  X A is a trivial FD  if X A is a nontrivial FD then X is a superkey for schema R  Each attribute B in A­X is contained in a candidate key for R Farkas CSCE 520 7 3NF and BCNF x BCNF gives  Lossless­join  No­redundancy  Dependency preservation not always possible x 3NF gives  Lossless­join  Dependency preservation  May have null values (transitive dependencies) Farkas CSCE 520 8 Multivalued Dependencies Fourth Normal Form Reasoning About FD’s + MVD’s This slides are from J. Ullman’s CS145 ­ Introduction to Databases web site at http://infolab.stanford.edu/~ullman/dscb.html#slides 9 Definition of MVD x A multivalued dependency (MVD) on R, X ­>­>Y , says that if two tuples of R agree on all the attributes of X, then their components in Y may be swapped, and the result will be two tuples that are also in the relation. x i.e., for each value of X, the values of Y are independent of the values of R­X­Y. 10 Example: MVD Drinkers(name, addr, phones, beersLiked) x A drinker’s phones are independent of the beers they like.  name­>­>phones and name ­>­>beersLiked. x Thus, each of a drinker’s phones appears with each of the beers they like in all combinations. x This repetition is unlike FD redundancy.  name­>addr is the only FD. 11 Tuples Implied by name­>­>phones If we have tuples: name sue sue sue sue addr a a a a phones beersLiked p1 b1 p2 b2 p2 b1 p1 b2 Then these tuples must also be in the relation. 12 Picture of MVD X ­>­>Y X Y others equal exchange 13 MVD Rules x Every FD is an MVD (promotion ).  If X ­>Y, then swapping Y ’s between two tuples that agree on X doesn’t change the tuples.  Therefore, the “new” tuples are surely in the relation, and we know X ­>­>Y. x Complementation : If X ­>­>Y, and Z is all the other attributes, then X ­>­>Z. 14 Splitting Doesn’t Hold x Like FD’s, we cannot generally split the left side of an MVD. x But unlike FD’s, we cannot split the right side either ­­­ sometimes you have to leave several attributes on the right side. 15 Example: Multiattribute Right Sides Drinkers(name, areaCode, phone, beersLiked, manf) x A drinker can have several phones, with the number divided between areaCode and phone (last 7 digits). x A drinker can like several beers, each with its own manufacturer. 16 Example Continued x Since the areaCode­phone combinations for a drinker are independent of the beersLiked­manf combinations, we expect that the following MVD’s hold: name ­>­> areaCode phone name ­>­> beersLiked manf 17 Example Data Here is possible data satisfying these MVD’s: name Sue Sue Sue Sue areaCode 650 650 415 415 phone 555­1111 555­1111 555­9999 555­9999 beersLiked Bud WickedAle Bud WickedAle manf A.B. Pete’s A.B. Pete’s But we cannot swap area codes or phones by themselves. That is, neither name­>­>areaCode nor name­>­>phone holds for this relation. 18 Fourth Normal Form x The redundancy that comes from MVD’s is not removable by putting the database schema in BCNF. x There is a stronger normal form, called 4NF, that (intuitively) treats MVD’s as FD’s when it comes to decomposition, but not when determining keys of the relation. 19 4NF Definition x A relation R is in 4NF if: whenever X ­>­>Y is a nontrivial MVD, then X is a superkey.  Nontrivial MVD means that: 1. Y is not a subset of X, and 2. X and Y are not, together, all the attributes.  Note that the definition of “superkey” still depends on FD’s only. 20 Decomposition and 4NF x If X ­>­>Y is a 4NF violation for relation R, we can decompose R using the same technique as for BCNF. 1. XY is one of the decomposed relations. 2. All but Y – X is the other. 21 Example: 4NF Decomposition Drinkers(name, addr, phones, beersLiked) FD: name ­> addr MVD’s: name ­>­> phones name ­>­> beersLiked x Key is {name, phones, beersLiked}. x All dependencies violate 4NF. 22 Example Continued x Decompose using name ­> addr: 1. Drinkers1(name, addr) x In 4NF; only dependency is name ­> addr. 1. Drinkers2(name, phones, beersLiked) x Not in 4NF. MVD’s name ­>­> phones and name ­>­> beersLiked apply. No FD’s, so all three attributes form the key. 23 Example: Decompose Drinkers2 x Either MVD name ­>­> phones or name ­>­> beersLiked tells us to decompose to:  Drinkers3(name, phones)  Drinkers4(name, beersLiked) 24 3NF, BCNF, 4NF 3NF BCNF 4NF 25 Properties Property 3NF BCNF 4NF Eliminates redundancy due to FDs Eliminates redundancy due to MVDs Preserves FDs No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Preserves MVDs No No No 26 ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/13/2011 for the course CSCE 520 taught by Professor Farkas during the Spring '11 term at South Carolina.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online