{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Economics Dynamics Problems 148

Economics Dynamics Problems 148 - {x[t>a t C[1 which is...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
132 Economic Dynamics Figure 3.21. solvers. One difference is shown immediately by attempting to solve the recursive equation x t = ax t 1 . The input and output from each programme is as follows. Mathematica RSolve[x[t]==ax[t-1],x[t],t] {{x[t]->a 1+t C[1] Maple rsolve(x(t)=a*x(t-1),x(t)); x(0)a t While Maple ’s output looks quite familiar, Mathematica ’s looks decidedly odd. The reason for this is that Mathematica is solving for a ‘future’ variable. If the input had been RSolve[x[t+1]== ax[t],x[t],t] Then the solution would be
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: {{x[t]->a t C[1]}} which is what we would expect. Note also that while Mathematica leaves unsolved the unknown constant, which it labels C[1], Maple assumes the initial condition is x (0) for t = 0. If attempting to solve y t = ay t − 1 + by y − 2 for example, then when using Mathematica , this should be thought of as y t + 2 = ay t + 1 + by t when solving for y t . With this caveat in mind, we can explore the RSolve and rsolve commands in more detail....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}