Economics Dynamics Problems 173

Economics Dynamics Problems 173 - Systems of first-order...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Systems of first-order differential equations 157 Then systems 4.4 and 4.5 are simply specific examples of the homogeneous linear system x = Ax ˙ (4.13) while system 4.6 is a specific example of the nonhomogeneous linear system x = Ax + b ˙ (4.14) For linear homogeneous systems, if the determinant of A is not zero, then the ∗ ∗ only solution, the only fixed point, is x∗ = 0, i.e., (x1 = 0 and x2 = 0). On the other hand, for nonhomogeneous linear systems, the equilibrium can be found, so long as A is nonsingular, from 0 = Ax∗ + b x∗ = −A−1 b (4.15) When considering the issue of stability/instability it is useful to note that linear nonhomogeneous systems can always be reduced to linear homogeneous systems in terms of deviations from equilibrium if an equilibrium exists. For x = Ax + b ˙ 0 = Ax∗ + b subtracting we immediately have in deviation form x = A(x − x∗ ) ˙ (4.16) ∗ ∗∗ (x1 , x2 ). which is homogeneous in terms of deviations from the fixed point x = There will be no loss of generality, therefore, if we concentrate on linear homogeneous systems. The matrix A is of particular importance in dealing with stability and instability. Two important properties of such a square matrix are its trace, denoted tr(A), and its determinant, denoted det(A), where4 tr(A) = a11 + a22 det(A) = a11 a21 a12 = a11 a22 − a12 a21 a22 (4.17) It should be noted that both the trace and the determinant are scalars. The matrix A is nonsingular if det(A) = 0. There is another property of the matrix A that arises for special linear systems. Consider the following general linear system y = Ax This can be viewed as a transformation of the vector x into the vector y. But suppose that x is transformed into a multiple of itself, i.e., y = λx, where λ is a scalar of proportionality. Then Ax = λx or (A − λI)x = 0 4 See Chiang (1984) or any book on linear algebra. (4.18) ...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online