Chap005 - Chapter 05 - Consolidated Financial Statements -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Chapter 05 - Consolidated Financial Statements - Intercompany Asset Transactions Chapter 05 Consolidated Financial Statements - Intercompany Asset Transactions Multiple Choice Questions 1. On November 8, 2009, Power Corp. sold land to Wood Co., its wholly owned subsidiary. The land cost $61,500 and was sold to Wood for $89,000. From the perspective of the combination, when is the gain on the sale of the land realized? A. Proportionately over a designated period of years B. When Wood Co. sells the land to a third party C. No gain can be recognized D. As Wood uses the land E. When Wood Co. begins using the land productively Difficulty: Easy 2. Edgar Co. acquired 60% of Kindall Co. on January 1, 2009. During 2009, Edgar made several sales of inventory to Kindall. The cost and selling price of the goods were $140,000 and $200,000, respectively. Kindall still owned one-fourth of the goods at the end of 2009. Consolidated cost of goods sold for 2009 was $2,140,000. How would consolidated cost of goods sold have differed if the inventory transfers had been for the same amount and cost, but from Kindall to Edgar? A. Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been $2,140,000 B. Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been $2,175,000 C. The effect on consolidated cost of goods sold cannot be predicted from the information provided D. Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been reduced because of the non-controlling interest in the subsidiary E. Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been higher because of the non-controlling interest in the subsidiary Difficulty: Medium 5-1 Chapter 05 - Consolidated Financial Statements - Intercompany Asset Transactions 3. On January 1, 2009, Race Corp. acquired 80% of the voting common stock of Gallow Inc. During the year, Race sold to Gallow for $450,000 goods which cost $330,000. Gallow still owned 15% of the goods at year-end. Gallow's reported net income was $204,000 and Race's net income was $806,000. Race decided to use the equity method to account for this investment. What was the non-controlling interest's share of consolidated net income ? A. $37,200 B. $22,800 C. $30,900 D. $32,900 E. $40,800 Difficulty: Easy 4. Webb Co. acquired 100% of Rand Inc. on January 5, 2009. During 2009, Webb sold Rand for $2,400,000 goods that cost $1,800,000. Rand still owned 40% of the goods at the end of the year. Cost of goods sold was $10,800,000 for Webb and $6,400,000 for Rand. What was consolidated cost of goods sold ? A. $17,200,000 B. $15,040,000 C. $14,800,000 D. $16,960,000 E. $14,560,000 Difficulty: Hard 5. Gentry Inc. acquired 100% of Gaspard Farms on January 5, 2009. During 2009, Gentry sold Gaspard Farms for $625,000 goods which had cost $425,000. Gaspard Farms still owned 12% of the goods at the end of the year. In 2010, Gentry sold goods with a cost of $800,000 to Gaspard Farms for $1,000,000 and Gaspard Farms still owned 10% of the goods at year-end....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/17/2011 for the course ACC 220 ACC220 taught by Professor Leslie during the Spring '11 term at University of Phoenix.

Page1 / 46

Chap005 - Chapter 05 - Consolidated Financial Statements -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online