Unformatted text preview: expired. And she continued to try to implement them. Issue: Rule: An offer made by one to another in a face to face conversation is deemed to continue only to the close of their conversation, and cannot be accepted thereafter Rational: First, Sedberry’s lapse of time expired. Their conversation ended already, and so the offer, during a face to face convo (reasonable time wise) expired when the conversation stopped. Second, Sedberry pushed aside their resignation, indicating that she rejected the offer. Even though she may have thought to herself that she will take them into consideration, she made no indication to the other party that she was going to do so. This made the two believe that the offer is off the table. Holding: The offer was expired before the acceptance came. This makes the offer invalid/ unenforceable. Synthesis: Dissent/Concurrences:...
View Full Document
- Fall '11
- J.B. Sedberry, Sedberry, company Sedberry Inc.